A while back, my daughter sent me a cute photo of an Easter dress she found on Pinterest, and asked if I could make one like it for her little girl. Of course, I said yes. The dress is made from a modern basic dress pattern and vintage dotted swiss fabric. I used rick-rack and buttons from my stash, and made the ears that I attached to the dress straps.
My granddaughter looked adorable in this dress! Then again, she looks pretty darn cute no matter what she’s wearing.
I guess I’ve reached that age where some truths seem so obvious, and yet when younger people stumble on one, they react as though they invented the concept.
Case in point: both the Atlantic and Fast Company are reporting on a “new” phenomenon: taking preschoolers outdoors to learn about the world around them. Can you imagine? Who would have thought that young children would learn more (and enjoy learning more) when they’re out in nature instead of locked in a classroom?
When I was a child, playing outside was my number one occupation in the summer; playing inside was my number one occupation the rest of the year. My parents did not have to pay $400 per month for me to play outside four days a week, 3.5 hours a day, as cited in the Atlantic article. Nope, back then, nature was free…and it still is.
While I’m thrilled that younger people than me are finally discovering that little kids don’t belong in classrooms, I’m stunned that people will pay so much money for “outdoor preschools.” And I guess the writer of the Atlantic article doesn’t even consider the existence of stay-at-home parents who can take their kids outside:
By and large, Riverside only works for parents who can afford to stop work and be available to pick kids up at 12:30 p.m. (or who have a full-time nanny or relative who can step in).
This bothers Huvos. “It’s become this unique, privileged thing: putting kids outside to play,” she says. Well-heeled parents realize, she says, that “this is what’s going to give your kid an academic advantage. This is what’s going to give your kid life success.” She hopes that if “affluent folks [are] demanding it,” more early education programs will emerge to provide more kids—of all backgrounds—more time outside.
I can’t wait until this generation discovers that you don’t have to pay a preschool to take your kids outside to discover the world around them; you can do it yourself pretty easily. Even if you’re not a stay-at-home parent, your spouse, your child’s grandparents, and other relatives and family friends can all take your child on regular outings in the great outdoors. It has nothing to do with being “unique” or “privileged,” and everything to do with getting off your …phone and paying attention to your child.
P.S. Playing outside is certainly nothing new!
Homeschooling continues to be popular, particularly as the quality of public schools continues to decline. This article makes a great case for homeschooling.
I just finished four pairs of leggings for my rapidly growing toddler granddaughter. Can you guess which two came from my old tops?
The two on the right were made from Coldwater Creek tops I used to wear; the turquoise pair had to be capris because the top wasn’t long enough. I cut the leggings out so that their hems were the same as the tops’ hems. That saved me some time.
The two on the left were made from vintage fabric I picked up at my town’s annual Salvation Army fabric sale. Vintage knit fabric is much sturdier than most modern knit fabric, and makes great leggings for active little girls.
All of the leggings were made from Simplicity pattern number 8304.
A high school senior who didn’t want to choose sides between joining last month’s National Gun Control Walkout or waiting it out in a study hall decided to just go to his classroom as usual. This netted him a suspension.
Giving someone a suspension for that is almost as ridiculous as locking up an 18-year-old in the waste-of-time known as modern high school when he could be out learning a trade by being an apprentice or, alternatively, attending college classes. I’m so glad we homeschooled our kids for high school; by age 18 they were either working, going to college or both.